Appendix A: A Practical Guide to Effective Discharge Calculations
Burkham, D. E. (1972). Channel changes of the Gila River in Safford Valley, Arizona, 1846-1970.
Professional Paper 655G, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 24 p.
Carling, P. A. (1988). The concept of dominant discharge applied to two gravel-bed streams in relation
to channel stability thresholds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 13:355-367.
Carlston, C. W. (1965). The relation of free meander geometry to stream discharge and its geomorphic
implications. American Journal of Science, 263:864-885.
Carlston, C. W. (1969). Downstream variations in the hydraulic geometry of streams: special emphasis on
mean velocity. American Journal of Science, 267:409-509.
Chang, H. H. (1979). Minimum stream power and river channel pattern. Journal of Hydrology, 41:303-
327.
Charlton, F. W., Brown, P. M., and Benson, R. W. (1978). The hydraulic geometry of some gravel rivers
in Britain. Report, IT180, Hydraulic Research Station, Wallingford.
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 21:455-468, ISSN 0020-
2754.
Dury, G. H. (1964). Principles of underfit streams. Professional Paper 452A, U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington, DC.
Dury, G. H. (1973). Magnitude-frequency analysis and channel morphology. In Morisawa, M. (Ed.),
Fluvial Geomorphology: A Proceedings Volume of the Fourth Annual Geomorphology Symposia
Series, Binghampton, New York, Allen and Unwin, pp. 91-121.
Emmett, W. W. (1975). The channels and waters of the upper Salmon River, Idaho. Professional Paper
870A, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
Ferguson, R. I. (1973). Channel pattern and sediment type. Area, 5:523-537.
Gardiner, J. L. (1991). River Projects and Conservation: A Manual for Holistic Appraisal. Wiley,
Chichester, UK.
Gupta, A. and Fox, H. (1974). Effects of high magnitude floods on channel form: a case study in Maryland
Piedmont. Water Resources Research, 10(3):499-509.
Hack, J. T. and Goodlett, J. C. (1960). Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the
central Appalachian. Professional Paper 347, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 66 p.
290