Introduction - CHL-99-170019
Figure 1.1 Breakwater failure modes
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170021
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170022
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170023
Incipient Stability of Breakwater Armor Units
Armor Stability Equations
Armor Stability Equations (cont.) - CHL-99-170026
Armor Stability Equations (cont.) - CHL-99-170027
Armor Incipient Motion Studies
Armor Incipient Motion Studies (cont.)
Experimental Setup
Figure 2.1 Flume plan (top) and profile (bottom) views for incipient motion experiment
Figure 2.2 Definition sketch for typical structure profile
Table 2.2 Ranges of Measured Physical Quantities and Common Dimensionless Parameters for Plans 3 and 4
Experimental Setup (cont.)
Incipient Motion Observations
Experimental Measurements
Figure 2.3 Velocity time series for one wave period with Ht = 12 cm, T = 1 s, dt = 24 cm and dL = 8.8 cm measured 1 cm outside the armor layer
Figure 2.4 Velocity vector for one wave period for armor lifting measured 1 cm outside the armor layer with Ht = 8.4 cm, T = 2 s, dt = 24 cm, and dL = 17 cm
Figure 2.6 Measurement locations for vertical velocities shown in Figure 2.5
Figure 2.7 Maximum vertical velocity versus the square root of wave steepness for wave periods T = 1 and 2 s and relative depths rd = 0.36, 0.5, and 0.7
Incipient Motion Prediction
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170042
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170043
Table 2.3 Summary of Convection Measurement Experiment Results with cot θ=2, Dn=4.6 cm, and dt=24 cm
Figure 2.8 Vertical variation of vertical velocity under a steep wave front across the armor layers as a function of wave steepness
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170046
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170047
Figure 2.9 Photographs of sphere motion during a typical incipient motion experiment for Plan 4
Figure 2.10 Incipient motion criterion (Equation 2.16 with vc = 61.8 cm/s) versus wave steepness
Conclusions from Incipient Motion Study
Historical Damage Measurement and Description
Figure 3.1 Sketch of breakwater profile with definition of eroded area and depth of cover
Eroded Volume Method
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170054
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170055
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170056
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170057
Stone Count Method
Damage Measurement Experiments
Damage Measurement Experiments (cont.) - CHL-99-170060
Damage Measurement Experiments (cont.) - CHL-99-170061
Damage Progression Prediction
Table 3.1 Jackson (1968) Breakwater Damage from table 7.9 of SPM (1984)
Figure 3.2 Danage, characterized as eroded volume, as a function of monochromatic wave height for angular stone (SPM 1984)
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170065
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170066
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170067
Variability in Stability Results
Variability in Stability Results (cont.)
Figure 3.3 Hudson stability coefficient versus relative depth for angular armor stone exposed to irregular waves
Deterioration Experiment
Figure 4.1 Flume profile for damage experiments
Figure 4.3 Photograph of model structures before testing
Experimental test conditions
Table 4.1 Experiment Conditions for Initial Damage Experiment
Figure 4.4 Armor and underlayer stone mass distributions for initial experiment
Armor Layer and Underlayer
Model-Prototype Similitude
Model-Prototype Similitude (cont.)
Wave Generation and Measurement in Initial Experiment
Table 4.2 Wave Generation in Initial Damage Experiment
Wave Measurement
Figure 4.5 Flume profile near structure with nearshore wave gage layout
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170084
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170085
Table 4.3 Nearshore Wave Statistics for Incident Spectra and Related Parameters with Structure in Place
Table 4.4 Nearshore Wave Statistics for Incident Time Series and Related Parameters with Structure in Place
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170088
Figure 4.6 Wave height variation throughout Waves 1, 2, and 3 at 11.9 cm toe depth
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170090
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170091
Effect of Overtopping on Stability
Figure 4.8 Plan (top) and Profile (bottom) views of breakwater profiler
Figure 4.9. Photograph of breakwater profiler
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170096
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170097
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170098
Damage Measurements
Overview - CHL-99-170100
Damage and Eroded Profile Parameters
Figure 5.1 Sketch of breakwater profile with definition of damage parameters
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth - CHL-99-170103
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth (cont.) - CHL-99-170104
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth (cont.) - CHL-99-170105
Figure 5.2 Probability density function for normalized damage S* for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 5.3 Probability density function for mormalized eroded depth E* for Series A', B', and C'
Temporal Damage Development - CHL-99-170108
Figure 5.5. Photographs of undamaged structures prior to Series AN
Figure 5.6 Profiles at beginning of Series A', damage level of S ≈ 0
Figure 5.7. Profiles midway through Series A , damage level of S = 6.5
Figure 5.8 Profiles following completion of Series A', damage level of S = 12.8
Figure 5.9. Photographs of structures following completion of Series AN, damage level of = 12.8
Figure 5.10 Number of waves versus mean damage one standard deviation for Series A'
Temporal Damage Development (cont.) - CHL-99-170115
Temporal Damage Development (cont.) - CHL-99-170116
Figure 5.11 Number of waves versus mean damage one standard deviation for Series B'
Characteristics of Profile Erosion
Figure 5.13 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded depth one standard deviation for Series A'
Figure 5.14 Number of waves versus mean minimum cover depth one standard deviation for Series A'
Figure 5.16 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum cover depth for Series A'
Figure 5.17 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series A'
Figure 5.18 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded depth one standard deviation for Series B'
Figure 5.20 Number of waves versus mean minimum cover depth one standard deviation for Series B'
Figure 5.22 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded length for Series B'
Figure 5.24 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum cover depth for Series B'
Figure 5.26 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series B'
Damage and Eroded Profile Prediction
Figure 6.1 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.2 Predictionof mean maximum eroded depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Damage Variability
Figure 6.4 Prediction of mean eroded length as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.5 Prediction of mean minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.6 Prediction of standard deviation of minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170135
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170136
Table 6.1 Depth-Limited Damage Data from Van der Meer (1988)
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170138
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170139
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170140
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170141
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170142
Figure 6.7 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series A'
Figure 6.8 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series B'
Effect of Wave Period and Armor Gradation Progression
Table 7.2 Summary of Incident Wave Characteristics
Experimental Setup and Test Conditions
Figure 7.1 Stone mass distributions for riprap and underlayer
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth - CHL-99-170149
Figure 7.2 Probability density function for normalized damage S* for Series D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.4 Probability density function for normalized cover depth C* for Series D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.5 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, as a function of mean damage for Series B', D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.6 Prediction of mean maximum eroded depth as afunction of mean damage for Series B', D', E', F', ang G'
Figure 7.7 Prediction of standard deviation of maximum eroded depth as a function of mean damage for Series B', D', F', and G'
Eroded Profile Prediction
Figure 7.9 Prediction of mean minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series B', D, E', F', and G
Temporal Damage Development - CHL-99-170157
Figure 7.11 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series D'
Figure 7.13 Dmage prediction relations compared to data for Series F'
Figure 7.15 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series D' including damage initiation adjustment
Figure 7.17 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series F' including damage initiation adjustment
Summary and Conclusions - CHL-99-170162
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170163
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170164
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170165
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170166
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170167
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170168
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170169
Appendix A. Summary of Wave Measurements
Figure A1. Wave generator command signals for six wave cases of initial experiment
Figure A.2 Spectra of wave generator command signals for Waves 1, 2, and 3 for 11.9 cm toe depth
Figure A.4 Wave 1 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.5 Wave 2 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.6 Wave 3 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.7 Wave 4 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.8 Wave 5 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.9 Wave 6 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.10 Wave 1 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.11 Wave 2 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.12 Wave 3 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.13 Wave 4 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.14 Wave 5 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.15 Wave 6 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.16 Wave 7 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.17 Wave 8 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.18 Wave 9 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.19 Wave 10 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.20 Wave 11 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.21 Wave 12 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.22 Wave 13 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.23 Wave 14 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.24 Wave 14 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.25 Wave 16 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.26 Wave 17 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.27 Wave 18 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.28 Wave 19 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.29 Wave 20 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.30 Wave 21 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.31 Wave 22 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.32 Wave 23 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.33 Wave 24 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.34 Wave 25 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.35 Wave 26 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Appendix B. Summary of Damage and Profile Measurements
Table B1. Series A' Measured Damage
Table B1. Series A' Measured Damage (cont.)
Table B2. Series B' Measured Damage
Table B3. Series C' Measured Damage
Table B4. Series D' Measured Damage
Table B5. Series E' Measured Damage
Table B6. Series F' Measured Damage
Table B7. Series G' Measured Damage
References - CHL-99-170214
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170215
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170216
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170217
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170218
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170219
Report Documentation Page - CHL-99-170220
CHL-99-17
Figure 1.1 Breakwater failure modes
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170021
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170022
Introduction (cont.) - CHL-99-170023
Incipient Stability of Breakwater Armor Units
Armor Stability Equations
Armor Stability Equations (cont.) - CHL-99-170026
Armor Stability Equations (cont.) - CHL-99-170027
Armor Incipient Motion Studies
Armor Incipient Motion Studies (cont.)
Experimental Setup
Figure 2.1 Flume plan (top) and profile (bottom) views for incipient motion experiment
Figure 2.2 Definition sketch for typical structure profile
Table 2.2 Ranges of Measured Physical Quantities and Common Dimensionless Parameters for Plans 3 and 4
Experimental Setup (cont.)
Incipient Motion Observations
Experimental Measurements
Figure 2.3 Velocity time series for one wave period with Ht = 12 cm, T = 1 s, dt = 24 cm and dL = 8.8 cm measured 1 cm outside the armor layer
Figure 2.4 Velocity vector for one wave period for armor lifting measured 1 cm outside the armor layer with Ht = 8.4 cm, T = 2 s, dt = 24 cm, and dL = 17 cm
Figure 2.6 Measurement locations for vertical velocities shown in Figure 2.5
Figure 2.7 Maximum vertical velocity versus the square root of wave steepness for wave periods T = 1 and 2 s and relative depths rd = 0.36, 0.5, and 0.7
Incipient Motion Prediction
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170042
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170043
Table 2.3 Summary of Convection Measurement Experiment Results with cot θ=2, Dn=4.6 cm, and dt=24 cm
Figure 2.8 Vertical variation of vertical velocity under a steep wave front across the armor layers as a function of wave steepness
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170046
Incipient Motion Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170047
Figure 2.9 Photographs of sphere motion during a typical incipient motion experiment for Plan 4
Figure 2.10 Incipient motion criterion (Equation 2.16 with vc = 61.8 cm/s) versus wave steepness
Conclusions from Incipient Motion Study
Historical Damage Measurement and Description
Figure 3.1 Sketch of breakwater profile with definition of eroded area and depth of cover
Eroded Volume Method
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170054
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170055
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170056
Eroded Volume Method (cont.) - CHL-99-170057
Stone Count Method
Damage Measurement Experiments
Damage Measurement Experiments (cont.) - CHL-99-170060
Damage Measurement Experiments (cont.) - CHL-99-170061
Damage Progression Prediction
Table 3.1 Jackson (1968) Breakwater Damage from table 7.9 of SPM (1984)
Figure 3.2 Danage, characterized as eroded volume, as a function of monochromatic wave height for angular stone (SPM 1984)
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170065
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170066
Damage Progression Prediction (cont.) - CHL-99-170067
Variability in Stability Results
Variability in Stability Results (cont.)
Figure 3.3 Hudson stability coefficient versus relative depth for angular armor stone exposed to irregular waves
Deterioration Experiment
Figure 4.1 Flume profile for damage experiments
Figure 4.3 Photograph of model structures before testing
Experimental test conditions
Table 4.1 Experiment Conditions for Initial Damage Experiment
Figure 4.4 Armor and underlayer stone mass distributions for initial experiment
Armor Layer and Underlayer
Model-Prototype Similitude
Model-Prototype Similitude (cont.)
Wave Generation and Measurement in Initial Experiment
Table 4.2 Wave Generation in Initial Damage Experiment
Wave Measurement
Figure 4.5 Flume profile near structure with nearshore wave gage layout
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170084
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170085
Table 4.3 Nearshore Wave Statistics for Incident Spectra and Related Parameters with Structure in Place
Table 4.4 Nearshore Wave Statistics for Incident Time Series and Related Parameters with Structure in Place
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170088
Figure 4.6 Wave height variation throughout Waves 1, 2, and 3 at 11.9 cm toe depth
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170090
Wave Measurement (cont.) - CHL-99-170091
Effect of Overtopping on Stability
Figure 4.8 Plan (top) and Profile (bottom) views of breakwater profiler
Figure 4.9. Photograph of breakwater profiler
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170096
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170097
Armor Profiler and Profile Measuring Technique (cont.) - CHL-99-170098
Damage Measurements
Overview - CHL-99-170100
Damage and Eroded Profile Parameters
Figure 5.1 Sketch of breakwater profile with definition of damage parameters
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth - CHL-99-170103
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth (cont.) - CHL-99-170104
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth (cont.) - CHL-99-170105
Figure 5.2 Probability density function for normalized damage S* for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 5.3 Probability density function for mormalized eroded depth E* for Series A', B', and C'
Temporal Damage Development - CHL-99-170108
Figure 5.5. Photographs of undamaged structures prior to Series AN
Figure 5.6 Profiles at beginning of Series A', damage level of S ≈ 0
Figure 5.7. Profiles midway through Series A , damage level of S = 6.5
Figure 5.8 Profiles following completion of Series A', damage level of S = 12.8
Figure 5.9. Photographs of structures following completion of Series AN, damage level of = 12.8
Figure 5.10 Number of waves versus mean damage one standard deviation for Series A'
Temporal Damage Development (cont.) - CHL-99-170115
Temporal Damage Development (cont.) - CHL-99-170116
Figure 5.11 Number of waves versus mean damage one standard deviation for Series B'
Characteristics of Profile Erosion
Figure 5.13 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded depth one standard deviation for Series A'
Figure 5.14 Number of waves versus mean minimum cover depth one standard deviation for Series A'
Figure 5.16 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum cover depth for Series A'
Figure 5.17 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series A'
Figure 5.18 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded depth one standard deviation for Series B'
Figure 5.20 Number of waves versus mean minimum cover depth one standard deviation for Series B'
Figure 5.22 Number of waves versus mean maximum eroded length for Series B'
Figure 5.24 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded depth and mean minimum cover depth for Series B'
Figure 5.26 Mean damage versus mean maximum eroded length for Series B'
Damage and Eroded Profile Prediction
Figure 6.1 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.2 Predictionof mean maximum eroded depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Damage Variability
Figure 6.4 Prediction of mean eroded length as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.5 Prediction of mean minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Figure 6.6 Prediction of standard deviation of minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series A', B', and C'
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170135
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170136
Table 6.1 Depth-Limited Damage Data from Van der Meer (1988)
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170138
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170139
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170140
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170141
Damage Variability (cont.) - CHL-99-170142
Figure 6.7 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series A'
Figure 6.8 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series B'
Effect of Wave Period and Armor Gradation Progression
Table 7.2 Summary of Incident Wave Characteristics
Experimental Setup and Test Conditions
Figure 7.1 Stone mass distributions for riprap and underlayer
Probability Density Functions of Damage, Eroded Depth, and Cover Depth - CHL-99-170149
Figure 7.2 Probability density function for normalized damage S* for Series D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.4 Probability density function for normalized cover depth C* for Series D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.5 Prediction of damage variability, characterized by the standard deviation, as a function of mean damage for Series B', D', E', F', and G'
Figure 7.6 Prediction of mean maximum eroded depth as afunction of mean damage for Series B', D', E', F', ang G'
Figure 7.7 Prediction of standard deviation of maximum eroded depth as a function of mean damage for Series B', D', F', and G'
Eroded Profile Prediction
Figure 7.9 Prediction of mean minimum cover depth as a function of mean damage for Series B', D, E', F', and G
Temporal Damage Development - CHL-99-170157
Figure 7.11 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series D'
Figure 7.13 Dmage prediction relations compared to data for Series F'
Figure 7.15 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series D' including damage initiation adjustment
Figure 7.17 Damage prediction relations compared to data for Series F' including damage initiation adjustment
Summary and Conclusions - CHL-99-170162
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170163
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170164
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170165
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170166
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170167
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170168
Summary and Conclusions (cont.) - CHL-99-170169
Appendix A. Summary of Wave Measurements
Figure A1. Wave generator command signals for six wave cases of initial experiment
Figure A.2 Spectra of wave generator command signals for Waves 1, 2, and 3 for 11.9 cm toe depth
Figure A.4 Wave 1 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.5 Wave 2 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.6 Wave 3 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.7 Wave 4 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.8 Wave 5 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.9 Wave 6 measured time series from wave gages
Figure A.10 Wave 1 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.11 Wave 2 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.12 Wave 3 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.13 Wave 4 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.14 Wave 5 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.15 Wave 6 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.16 Wave 7 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.17 Wave 8 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.18 Wave 9 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.19 Wave 10 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.20 Wave 11 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.21 Wave 12 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.22 Wave 13 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.23 Wave 14 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.24 Wave 14 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.25 Wave 16 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.26 Wave 17 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.27 Wave 18 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.28 Wave 19 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.29 Wave 20 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.30 Wave 21 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.31 Wave 22 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.32 Wave 23 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.33 Wave 24 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.34 Wave 25 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Figure A.35 Wave 26 incident and reflected spectra from wave gages
Appendix B. Summary of Damage and Profile Measurements
Table B1. Series A' Measured Damage
Table B1. Series A' Measured Damage (cont.)
Table B2. Series B' Measured Damage
Table B3. Series C' Measured Damage
Table B4. Series D' Measured Damage
Table B5. Series E' Measured Damage
Table B6. Series F' Measured Damage
Table B7. Series G' Measured Damage
References - CHL-99-170214
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170215
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170216
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170217
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170218
References (cont.) - CHL-99-170219
Report Documentation Page - CHL-99-170220
CHL-99-17
