| Tweet |
Custom Search
|
|
|
||
 City of Solana Beach
Shoreline and Coastal Bluff Management Strategies Draft MEIR
Summary
Table S-1 (continued)
Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
II. Significant Environmental Impacts That Can Be Avoided or Mitigated (Section 151 26[c]
of the State CEQA Guidelines) (Continued)
Category/
Alternative
Environmental Impacts
Mitigation
Land Use
Alternative 4
Inconsistent with the City's General Plan
The impact to residential land use along the
and the California Coastal Act
bluff tops from this alternative shall require a
new Solana Beach General Plan policy to
relocate and rebuild displaced structures, as
well as, ideally, new state statutes addressing
the same issues. To mitigate land use impacts
from this alternative to less than significant
levels, elements of new policies could include
one or more of the following:
provisions to adequately compensate
homeowners for the economic loss of their
property2
provisions to relocate structures, if
possible, to another property within the
region
provisions to relocate residents and assist
in the identification of residences of similar
size and quality as the vacated property
Biological Resources
Alternative 3
Implementation of types of retention
The following mitigation was developed for
structures (groins) could have significant
artificial sand retention, reefs, breakwaters,
impacts to reef habitat.
and groins within the Regional Beach Sand
Retention Strategy by SANDAG:
Temporary turbidity impacts to
Avoid construction in reef habitat area
endangered least tern nesting sites
within the area could result during
Create hard substrate subtidal habitat when
construction of breakwaters or reefs.
rocky groins are implemented
Avoid construction during least tern
nesting season
Implement an environmental monitoring
program during sand replenishment and
construction operations
2
The provision of financial compensation is not, strictly speaking, a mitigation measure for an "environmental" impact subject to
CEQA. Rather, such compensation is proposed as an economic measure intended to avoid financial effects that would occur under
a Planned Retreat Policy. Such compensation would not be a requirement of CEQA.
Project No. 323530000
Page S-10
|
 
|
|
|
||
